The Spanish government has cancelled a €6.6 million arms deal with the Israeli company IMI Systems following intense backlash from junior coalition partners and growing domestic criticism over the country’s stance on the Gaza conflict. The decision, announced Thursday, signals a reaffirmation of Spain’s foreign policy position of distancing itself from military cooperation with Israel amid ongoing allegations of human rights abuses in Gaza.

A Controversial Contract

The scrapped deal involved the purchase of 15.3 million rounds of 9mm ammunition intended for Spain’s Guardia Civil police force. The Interior Ministry had initially argued that the contract—reportedly at an advanced stage—was too costly to cancel and necessary to maintain operational readiness for domestic security.

However, news of the deal sparked an outcry from within the ruling coalition, particularly from the left-wing Sumar platform led by Deputy Prime Minister and Labour Minister Yolanda Díaz. Sumar and its affiliated parties condemned the agreement as a “flagrant breach” of Spain’s policy to hold Israel accountable for its military actions in Gaza. The United Left, a group within Sumar, declared it would not tolerate “any part of the executive financing a genocidal state.”

Political and Ethical Backlash

The contract became a flashpoint in an already tense relationship between the socialist Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party (PSOE), led by Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez, and its junior coalition partners. The dispute also coincides with ongoing debates over Sánchez’s broader defense policy, particularly his controversial push to increase Spain’s defense budget to meet NATO’s 2% GDP target—a move Sumar called “exorbitant” and “incoherent.”

Under mounting pressure, the offices of Sánchez and Díaz issued a joint statement on Thursday confirming the cancellation of the arms order. The Spanish government will now block the import license for the ammunition and seek legal counsel to finalize the contract’s termination.

“All paths of negotiation have been exhausted,” the statement read. “The parties that make up the progressive coalition government are firmly committed to the Palestinian cause and to peace in the Middle East. That is why Spain will neither buy arms from, nor sell arms to, Israeli companies.”

Spain’s Firm Stance on Gaza

Since the escalation of the conflict in Gaza following Hamas’s October 7, 2023 attacks, Prime Minister Sánchez has been one of Europe’s most vocal critics of Israel’s military response. He has publicly questioned Israel’s adherence to international humanitarian law and described the death toll in Gaza as “truly unbearable.”

In alignment with that rhetoric, Spain formally recognized the State of Palestine in 2024 and suspended all military cooperation with Israel. Government sources have now clarified that all outstanding Israeli arms contracts signed before October 7 will also be voided.

Broader Implications

The cancellation of the contract is likely to reinforce Spain’s diplomatic position on the Israel-Palestine conflict and could strain relations with Israel, which continues to deny allegations of genocide currently being reviewed by the International Court of Justice. It also highlights growing divisions within European governments as public opinion shifts and international pressure mounts to address the humanitarian crisis in Gaza.

With this move, Spain positions itself at the forefront of European efforts to tie arms trade and foreign policy to human rights considerations—an approach that may influence other governments grappling with similar dilemmas.

Diplomatic efforts to end the prolonged war between Russia and Ukraine hit another impasse on Thursday as both sides traded blame for the stalled peace process, escalating tensions amid mounting international pressure for resolution.

Zelenskiy and Putin Clash Over Peace Approach

Russian officials accused Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy of deliberately sabotaging peace negotiations, while Ukraine countered that President Vladimir Putin is the true obstacle to peace. The clash comes in the wake of faltering talks in London between U.S., Ukrainian, and European diplomats aimed at brokering a ceasefire.

Maria Zakharova, spokesperson for Russia’s Foreign Ministry, said Zelenskiy “categorically refused to make any concessions” and insisted on terms that could “torpedo the emerging peace process at any cost.”

“He is not interested in real dialogue,” Zakharova told reporters. “What we witnessed yesterday was a political posture, not a genuine negotiation.”

In response, Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Syhiba posted a strongly worded message on X (formerly Twitter), blaming Russia for continued bloodshed. “Yesterday’s Russian maximalist demands for Ukraine to withdraw from its regions, combined with these brutal strikes, show that Russia, not Ukraine, is the obstacle to peace,” he wrote.

His comments followed a deadly overnight missile and drone barrage on Kyiv, which claimed at least eight lives. Ukrainian officials view the attacks as evidence of Russia’s disinterest in peace and determination to solidify its territorial gains.

U.S. President Trump Pressures Both Sides

Adding to the diplomatic strain, U.S. President Donald Trump expressed growing frustration with the stalemate, signaling a potential shift in Washington’s approach. In a social media post on Wednesday, Trump warned he might withdraw U.S. mediation efforts if Russia and Ukraine fail to make progress.

“The window for a deal is closing. If they don’t want peace, we won’t force it,” Trump posted.

Trump also stirred controversy by dismissing Ukraine’s stance on Crimea, saying the territory “was lost years ago and is not even a point of discussion.” That statement drew immediate backlash from Kyiv, where officials insist that accepting Russia’s 2014 annexation would violate Ukraine’s constitution and sovereignty.

Crimea: The Core Sticking Point

The dispute over Crimea remains one of the deepest divides between the two nations. Russia seized the peninsula following a controversial 2014 referendum, which was widely condemned by the United Nations and Western nations as illegitimate.

Zelenskiy, reiterating his country’s position earlier this week, insisted that Ukraine would “never” recognize Crimea as Russian. In contrast, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov praised Trump’s remarks, saying they “completely align with our longstanding view” and that Crimea is “an inseparable part of Russia.”

The peninsula’s strategic significance—home to Russia’s Black Sea Fleet and used as a launch site for attacks on Ukraine—has made it central to both military operations and peace talks.

Truce Talks Collapse

Although the U.S. had recently brokered a tentative 30-day truce between Kyiv and Moscow, that agreement has since unraveled. Russia countered the ceasefire with a list of preconditions and raised concerns that the pause would only allow Ukraine to rearm and mobilize more troops.

European governments, meanwhile, continue to support Ukraine with military aid. Moscow claims these arms shipments are emboldening Zelenskiy and delaying peace, while Western allies insist Ukraine has a right to defend itself after Russia’s full-scale invasion in 2022.

Over the last three years, the conflict has caused the deaths of tens of thousands of civilians and soldiers, displaced millions, and leveled entire towns across Ukraine.

Looking Ahead

With no immediate breakthrough in sight, and diplomatic efforts now under threat of abandonment by the U.S., the path to peace looks increasingly uncertain. Both Russia and Ukraine appear entrenched in their positions, while the international community watches anxiously as the war grinds on with devastating human and geopolitical consequences.

Whether future talks can succeed where previous efforts have failed may depend on finding common ground on Crimea—a challenge that continues to stand as the war’s most intractable obstacle.

Cornell University has canceled the upcoming performance of R&B singer Kehlani at its annual end-of-semester “Slope Day” concert following intense backlash from Jewish students and alumni. The decision, announced by university president Michael Kotlikoff in a campus-wide email on Wednesday, came after concerns were raised over the singer’s past political statements and perceived antisemitic rhetoric.

A Controversial Performer Choice

Kehlani, initially announced as the Slope Day headliner on April 10, quickly became a divisive figure on campus. The student-led announcement drew immediate criticism from the group Cornellians for Israel, which publicly called for the university to rescind the invitation due to the artist’s inflammatory public statements and imagery perceived as hostile toward Israel.

Among the key concerns was Kehlani’s 2023 music video that included the phrase “Long Live the Intifada”, a reference to the Palestinian uprisings against Israel that resulted in thousands of casualties. She had also posted on X (formerly Twitter), “It’s f— Israel, it’s f— Zionism, and it’s also f— a lot of y’all too,” sparking accusations of antisemitism.

Shift in University Stance

Initially, President Kotlikoff had indicated that it was “too late” to cancel the performance and that the university had made contractual adjustments to minimize political expression. However, after speaking with Jewish students—including during a Shabbat dinner—and receiving growing pressure from students, parents, and national organizations, Kotlikoff reversed course.

In his statement, he wrote:

“In the days since Kehlani was announced, I have heard grave concerns from our community that many are angry, hurt, and confused… While any artist has the right in our country to express hateful views, Slope Day is about uniting our community, not dividing it.”

A Divided Campus, A Broader Debate

The controversy reflects growing tensions on U.S. campuses over the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, where free speech, political expression, and community inclusiveness often clash. Jewish students and supporters expressed relief following the cancellation.

The group Cornellians for Israel, which had circulated posts calling for Kehlani’s removal or for refunds of the $384 student activity fee, updated their Instagram with a caption that read:
“Jewish students have made our voices heard.”

Conversely, some students and civil liberties advocates expressed concerns about the implications for artistic freedom and the precedent set by capitulating to political pressure.

Looking Ahead: New Selection Process Promised

President Kotlikoff acknowledged the difficulty of the decision and promised reforms to the artist selection process:

“I understand that my decision will be celebrated by some and criticized by others. I believe it is the right thing to do… We will revise the process for researching and selecting performers moving forward.”

No alternative lineup has been announced for Slope Day, which remains one of the most anticipated social events on campus each year.

Political and Parental Pressure

The incident also comes as Cornell faces potential federal funding cuts over alleged antisemitism, adding further urgency to university leadership’s actions. The topic has been a source of concern in the Cornell Parents Facebook group, where some questioned the judgment of booking Kehlani amid heightened political scrutiny.

Final Thoughts

This episode at Cornell underscores a wider national conversation about the balance between inclusion and free expression, especially in politically charged contexts. As universities become increasingly scrutinized for how they respond to student concerns and external pressures, the Kehlani controversy may serve as a touchstone for future debates on college campuses across the country.

A wildfire in New Jersey has rapidly spread to over 8,500 acres, forcing the declaration of a state of emergency as the fire continues to wreak havoc. The Jones Road Wildfire, which ignited near Toms River on Tuesday afternoon, has already led to the evacuation of thousands, the destruction of power lines, and the threat of burning more than 1,000 structures in the path of the flames.

Explosion of Flames: A Rapid Escalation

What started as a small blaze on Tuesday around 12:30 p.m. quickly escalated overnight, fueled by high winds and dry vegetation. By Wednesday morning, the fire had exploded to an alarming 8,500 acres, putting the surrounding area, including Ocean County, on high alert. Local authorities confirmed that the fire was only 10% contained, and officials are working around the clock to bring the blaze under control.

State of Emergency Declared

New Jersey’s Acting Governor, Lt. Gov. Tahesha Way, declared a state of emergency on Wednesday morning to release additional resources for the firefighting effort. This measure was essential in managing the increasing scale of the fire, which was threatening more than 1,000 structures and has already caused widespread evacuations. “Due to its accelerated growth, with an estimated burn of 8,500 acres, threatening more than 1,000 structures, requiring the evacuation of residents, and the loss of power to over 25,000 residents, I am declaring a State of Emergency for Ocean County,” said Lt. Gov. Way in a statement.

The fire, located south of Toms River along the Garden State Parkway, was particularly concerning due to its proximity to this major road. At one point on Tuesday evening, flames leapt across the highway, forcing its closure and halting one of the busiest transportation routes in the state.

Evacuations and Damage

More than 3,000 residents have been forced to evacuate the area, with evacuation notices still in effect as of Wednesday morning. Several of those affected have shared their harrowing experiences. “As the day progressed, it was kind of scary,” said Michael Ferrara, an evacuee. “Flames and smoke closed in on my neighborhood, and I had to make the decision to leave.” Ferrara expressed the eerie feeling of not knowing what to take during the evacuation, saying, “What are you going to take with you? Birth certificates, passports?”

While no fatalities have been reported so far, the fire has caused significant disruptions. More than 25,000 residents were left without power due to a forced outage from the blaze, and authorities are continuing to monitor the situation.

Firefighting Efforts and Weather Conditions

Firefighters are working diligently to contain the flames, but they face challenging conditions, with gusty winds and dry weather fueling the fire’s rapid spread. Winds were expected to gust up to 20 mph on Wednesday morning, although the forecast calls for calmer conditions later in the day. The high pressure moving in may provide some relief, but rain is not expected until Friday night, which could help in containing the fire.

A Community in Crisis

As residents await news of their homes and the future of their neighborhoods, the situation remains uncertain. One evacuee expressed the anxiety that comes with the unknown: “I hope that I have a home to return back to,” said one distraught resident.

This wildfire, which is continuing to grow, serves as a stark reminder of the risks posed by wildfires, particularly during dry, windy conditions. The community’s resilience is being tested as they navigate these trying circumstances, and authorities continue their efforts to contain the Jones Road Wildfire.

Looking Ahead

As the situation evolves, local officials urge residents to stay informed and follow evacuation instructions. The state of emergency will remain in effect as firefighters and first responders work tirelessly to control the fire, with hopes that rain will bring much-needed relief in the coming days. For now, the priority remains ensuring the safety of the residents and minimizing further damage.

In the face of this massive wildfire, New Jersey’s emergency services are stepping up to support those impacted, with the entire community hoping for a swift resolution to what has been a devastating event.

In a dramatic escalation of regional tensions, a ballistic missile fired by the Iran-backed Houthi rebels in Yemen triggered air raid sirens early Wednesday morning in Haifa and the Western Galilee — the first such incident in northern Israel since the current conflict reignited. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) confirmed that the missile was intercepted successfully by its air defense systems, averting what could have been a deadly strike.

First Sirens in Haifa Since Ceasefire With Hezbollah

The missile attack marked a significant geographic shift in the Houthi threat. Until now, the majority of Houthi-fired projectiles have been aimed at central and southern Israel. Wednesday’s sirens in Haifa and the Western Galilee were the first in the area since a ceasefire with the Lebanese terror group Hezbollah took effect in November 2024. Explosions from the interception were clearly heard in Haifa, jolting residents from sleep at 4 a.m. and sending over a million people scrambling for bomb shelters.

While no direct injuries from the missile or falling debris were reported, Magen David Adom emergency services treated several individuals who were hurt while rushing to shelters.

Houthi Claims and IDF Response

The Houthis claimed responsibility, boasting that they had targeted a “vital Zionist enemy target” in Haifa. They also asserted they had launched a drone toward Tel Aviv — though the IDF reported no drone incursions from Yemen overnight.

In a precautionary move, the Israel Police instructed the public not to approach any fallen debris, warning it may still contain explosives. Police forces were also placed on alert to search for missile remnants if reported.

Early Alert System Faces Glitches

The IDF had recently rolled out a new missile early warning system, which uses push notifications to provide civilians with a 3–5 minute advance alert before sirens sound. During Wednesday’s incident, however, the system failed to operate as intended.

The IDF acknowledged that although the missile was detected in time, a “malfunction occurred in the transmitting of information” from the Air Force to the Home Front Command. This resulted in delays and incomplete alerts for the civilian population.

“As a result, the preliminary directives were activated at shorter intervals than required,” the military said in a statement, noting that the issue has since been addressed.

This was the second time the system has faltered since its launch. During a previous Houthi missile attack on central Israel just days earlier, many residents reported receiving no alert at all.

Surge in Houthi Missile Activity

Since March 18, when Israel resumed its military operations in Gaza, the Houthis have launched over 20 ballistic missiles and several drones at Israel. According to military sources, only half of those missiles reached Israeli territory and triggered sirens — the rest fell short.

Wednesday’s launch was the latest in a series of Houthi escalations that resumed following the collapse of the temporary ceasefire between Israel and Hamas in January 2025. During the initial phase of the conflict, the Houthis launched around 40 ballistic missiles and multiple drones toward Israel, including a deadly strike in July that killed one civilian and injured several in Tel Aviv.

In response, Israel has conducted several targeted airstrikes against Houthi military infrastructure in Yemen. Meanwhile, the United States has taken a leading role in international efforts to deter Houthi aggression, launching extensive airstrikes against Houthi leadership and supply networks in recent weeks.

Part of a Larger Axis of Hostility

The Houthis, officially known as Ansar Allah, are staunchly aligned with Iran and share ideological and strategic goals with Hezbollah and Hamas. Their slogan, “Death to America, Death to Israel, a Curse on the Jews,” underscores their vehement opposition to the existence of Israel and their alignment with Iran’s broader regional ambitions.

With the Gaza war still raging and the regional coalition of Iran-backed actors — including Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis — continuing coordinated attacks, Israel remains on high alert across multiple fronts.

The early-morning missile attack on Haifa serves as a stark reminder of the growing reach and unpredictability of the threats Israel faces. The IDF has reiterated its commitment to strengthening its multi-layered missile defense systems and correcting flaws in its civilian alert mechanisms.

As tensions escalate, the citizens of Israel remain braced for further challenges in what is increasingly becoming a multi-front conflict.

A swimmer has gone missing after an extremely rare and harrowing shark attack off the coast of northern Israel, sending shockwaves through the local community and raising alarm over an area usually known for its calm, warm waters.

The incident occurred on Monday near Olga Beach in Hadera, approximately 40 kilometers (25 miles) north of Tel Aviv. Witnesses on the beach described the scene as chaotic and terrifying, with video footage circulating on social media capturing frantic screams and shocked reactions as the swimmer appeared to struggle far out at sea.

A Shocking and Unprecedented Event

“I was in the water, I saw blood and there were screams,” Eliya Motai, an eyewitness, told Ynet. “It’s terrifying. We were here yesterday and saw the sharks circling us.”

Authorities have closed the beach as Israeli police and rescue teams launch a large-scale search operation for the missing man. Despite the presence of sharks in the area, experts emphasize that shark attacks in Israel are almost unheard of.

According to local reports, this is only the fourth documented shark attack in Israeli waters and the first potential fatality since the country’s founding in 1948. Prior to this, no deadly shark incidents had ever been recorded in Israeli history.

Why Do Sharks Gather in Hadera?

Marine biologists note that dusky and sandbar sharks are known to frequent the waters off Hadera, particularly near the Orot Rabin power station, Israel’s largest electricity-generating plant. The warm water discharged by the plant and the abundance of fish drawn in from a nearby stream make it an ideal environment for these predators.

While these species are typically not aggressive toward humans, the congregation of both fish and sharks in close proximity to swimmers increases the risk of rare interactions.

Community Shaken, Authorities on High Alert

In the wake of the attack, the Israeli public and tourists alike have been urged to exercise caution, especially near power station outflows and known shark aggregation zones.

“This tragic incident is a stark reminder that nature can be unpredictable,” said a spokesperson from Israel’s Nature and Parks Authority. “We are working closely with marine experts to better understand what may have triggered this event.”

Local authorities have yet to release the identity of the missing swimmer. The search continues with divers, drones, and rescue boats combing the coastline in hopes of locating the man or any evidence that might help explain what transpired.

As Israel reels from this rare marine tragedy, many are calling for greater public awareness, enhanced monitoring, and clearer safety guidelines for swimming in areas known for shark activity.

In a highly charged interview with Israel’s Radio 103FM on Tuesday, former Religious Zionist Party MK Zvi Sukkot made waves by asserting that a ruling by the High Court of Justice supporting the removal of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should be ignored, should such a scenario arise.

Sukkot’s remarks came in response to recent developments involving Shin Bet (Israel Security Agency) Chief Ronen Bar, who submitted an affidavit to the High Court contesting his dismissal by the government. The issue has inflamed debate over legal authority, democratic checks and balances, and the boundaries of executive power in Israel.

“This Is a Coup, Not a Legal Proceeding”

According to Sukkot, the potential collaboration between the head of the Shin Bet, Attorney-General Gali Baharav-Miara, and the High Court to declare Netanyahu unfit for office would constitute what he describes as an illegal seizure of power.
“There cannot be a situation where the prime minister wants to fire people from their positions, and then suddenly those who decide to remove him do so with authority they do not have by law, and the High Court supports this,” Sukkot stated.
He went further, calling such a move “a political event, an event of a coup,” and stressed, “we cannot cooperate with it.”

Sukkot framed his criticism within a broader concern about the balance of power in Israel’s democratic institutions. His statements tap into growing tensions between the executive branch and judicial authorities, as well as longstanding criticisms from the right regarding what they see as overreach by Israel’s legal system.

Defense of Netanyahu Amid Political Turmoil

Sukkot did not stop at criticizing the judiciary. He also took aim at Ronen Bar, questioning the timing and motivations behind his affidavit and public statements.
“Aren’t you bothered that a person, under whose watch these things happened, only remembers to speak to the public after he is fired?” he said.

Sukkot further argued that the role of Israel’s security leadership must be depoliticized and rooted in loyalty to democratic processes, not media optics or political games.
“I expect from the head of the Shin Bet, that if the prime minister tells him, ‘Go spy on citizens illegally, turn the Shin Bet into the Stasi,’ he should leave at that moment, hand over the keys, and tell the people of Israel, ‘This is what the prime minister is trying to do,’” Sukkot added, implying that if Bar had concerns, he should have raised them earlier, not after facing termination.

The Broader Implications

This bold assertion that the judiciary can be ignored if it rules against Netanyahu has sparked a firestorm among legal experts, opposition figures, and defenders of judicial independence. Many warn that Sukkot’s stance risks undermining Israel’s democratic institutions and the public’s faith in the rule of law.

With Israeli politics already navigating turbulent waters amid national security challenges, judicial reform debates, and deep political polarization, Sukkot’s comments underscore the fragility of Israel’s institutional trust and the heightened tensions within the current political climate.

As the situation develops, eyes will remain on both the High Court and Prime Minister Netanyahu’s next moves — with a nation watching closely as questions of legality, leadership, and legitimacy hang in the balance.