In a controversial development, the CIA has reportedly sent an unclassified email to the White House listing new hires with two years or less tenure. This move was made in compliance with an executive order aimed at downsizing the federal workforce, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter. The decision, described by officials as the “least bad option,” raises significant national security concerns.
The list reportedly includes first names and last initials of employees, ranging from analysts to trainees preparing for undercover roles. While designed to minimize risks, the choice to disclose even partial identities poses potential dangers. One source highlighted that some employees have “uncommon” first names, which could allow foreign intelligence services to cross-reference publicly available data and potentially identify these individuals.
Although the listed hires have likely not yet been deployed overseas in undercover roles, the exposure could impact their future assignments. CIA officials may now consider it too risky to send these individuals to high-risk postings, effectively jeopardizing their careers before they begin.
A CIA spokesperson confirmed compliance with the executive orders, stating, “We are providing requested information through the appropriate channels.” However, the decision has faced fierce criticism from lawmakers.
House Intelligence Committee ranking member Jim Himes of Connecticut condemned the action, emphasizing its potential harm to national security. “Those details are secret for a reason — because protecting the identities of CIA employees is critical to their safety and mission, a mission that helps keep Americans safe every day,” Himes stated. He also expressed concerns about the possible mass dismissal of provisional employees.
Adding to the workforce reduction efforts, the CIA recently became the first major national security agency to offer buyouts as part of a broader strategy to streamline operations and “infuse the Agency with renewed energy.”
The implications of this unprecedented move extend beyond workforce logistics. Experts and officials worry that compromising even partial employee information could embolden foreign adversaries and undermine the agency’s operational capabilities. As the situation unfolds, critics warn that the potential cost to national security and agency morale could be severe.
Source: New York Times
